The Gospel Myth of Christianity

2

Qumran Bet wishes to inform you that we do not accept the NT nor do we see any Savior but YHWH however we all must start somewhere. May what is written here help you on your journey.

One must question what is truth and what is the mythology that has become the cornerstone of Christianity’s mythic world of “make believe”. However another plausible account is found in the first forty years and Christians must come to understand about the recorded accounts as compared to “the sayings” of the man “Jesus” and what is portrayed in the four gospels accounts.

The problem lies in the fact that the gospel was set in a mindset of western culture shaping the Christian mentality. And it is in this story they invest time to perpetuate this literary invention which constitutes a danger of which, many are not particularly aware.

I endeavor to present a different approach by avoiding their approach of the so-called “Gospel”.

When Christians recall their gospel story, they do not think of it as four distinct narratives, but a combination of four views seen through four different parties. A combination of four views was concocted and presented as a single story working in favor of the “Church” (Rome) for 1700 years or so. These four stories were merged to one illustrative record of conventional imagery that became a convincing propaganda for this symbolic masterpiece. These symbols became associated with the Christian religion, an official story that shaped the formal worship of a man: “Jesus”, a man-god. These select writings are arranged and sanctioned by the “Church”(Rome) and its notables. What they achieved in putting together their myth-story was an astonishing literary success that remains to this very day. This mythological witness of “Jesus” is an amazing record of his experiences: crucifixion, death and resurrection. This story was actually prepared and set a stage for a future about to begin for the new adherents (pagan masses) through this literary devise awaited Paul’s proclamation: a new “savior”, --a man-god -“who died (crucified) for mankind’s sin”. It worked!

 

Whence Messiah? It is proposed the Messiah idea, considered sacrosanct by the Jewish people. But while in the exile in Persia they submitted themselves to the Persian religion and culture and corrupted the messianic idea in imbibing the Zoroastrian religion by inclusion and continuation of the Iranian saoshyant, a savior/ messiah of the Zoroastrian religion of the Medes and Persians, “which changes not.” The Persians favored this myth of the Persians and Assyrians of Babylon continues its pagan influence! The Jews assimilated its religion and culture while in Persia exile and was reinstated by the Rabbinates who totally discarded its evil influence and its sinister authority. And today it s reappears again o select arrangement of writings found in Pauline letters found acceptance and placed as a vanguard of the “New Testament.” The Christian “gospel” is unknowingly, to many, a project based on similar mythmaking: a single tenable story that may not be historically disproved, and this magic became their new but believable mythical “gospel”.

Let us view the four gospels and see what was accomplished when viewed only as a single story. Let us deal with Mark’s account. Mark is read through the eyes of Paul. Mark was rewritten by the church and combined Paul’s portrayal of a “Jesus story” as the dying martyr for mankind. This subject matter comes from Paul’s “Christ” myth and his traditions of a ”Jesus’ movement. In turn, Paul’s fortified it by cleverly written traditions as propaganda for his Jesus movement.

 

 

Comments

Chapter 3

Hit Counter

Index